“startling”造句，怎麼用startling造句

New findings from Japan suggest a startling way to extend your lifespan - if you're a woman.

Academics came up with the startling images after throwing away 500 years of conventional cartography.

Lewis, came to a startling conclusion about him that altered the course of his who is the real Jesus?

But in recent years, some of us have started taking our beloved cell phones someplace really startling: the grave.

One April morning, she and her husband noticed that Saoirse wasn't wandering around as she normally would. Even more startling, she had two black eyes.

It has pushed a little-known painting and its story to wider attention - and dragged a startling character into the light.

One of the most startling turn of events was the saga of the arrest of Saif al-Islam, the second son and the man widely seen, until several months ago, as his likely successor.

This ever-changing identity was startling, but, on second thought, it made sense: after all, Charles DE Gaulle famously said that it is difficult to govern a country with 246 types of cheese.

The spread of the prairies was indeed a startling sight.

Even this startling ratio is not the outer limit.

In the first place, his startling likeness to Catherine connected him fearfully with her.

Legal and rational though this activity may be, the results of the offshore boom can be startling.

The most obvious reason for the rise in unhappiness is the recession, which is destroying jobs at a startling rate and spreading anxiety throughout the workforce.

But as World water Day approaches, news reports have focused on a startling fact: The very students tapped to save China's water supply have been wasting it - sometimes in dramatic proportions.

He was immediately confronted by the startling headlines.

This startling fact reveals a basic truth: Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East.

It was startling to discover that a new study has found that there is only one female character to every three male characters in family movies.

Equally puzzling is that the book's footnotes give no references for its most startling contentions.

If the Tories win, they will send a startling number of new MPs to Westminster, especially given the large number of impending retirements by sitting ones, voluntary and otherwise.

My own path of self-discovery led me to a startling conclusion: we don't get angry at facts; we get angry at our interpretation of facts.